by Yes folks, this is actually a direct quote.
No, it’s not satire.
It’s not the Babylon Bee, although you’d think even they wouldn’t come up with something so crazy for fake satire.
Sadly, this is a true quote from a Biden Administration official, proving just how much these people are not only out of touch with reality but very dangerous and bad for America.
The White House literally just told all Americans they MUST continue to pay crippling high gas prices in order to preserve the “liberal world order” and support Ukraine.
Oh my.
The clip comes from CNN of all places, where even the CNN anchor is starting to question the Biden Regime by asking “how long do you expect Americans to keep paying these high prices?”
The answer?
AS LONG AS IT TAKES TO SUPPORT THE LIBERAL WORLD ORDER.
Yes. He really said that.
Watch here:
And here:
ackup clip here:
Even liberals are asking, “no way he really said that….right?”
From ZeroHedge, here are more details:
The comments were made by Biden advisor Brian Deese during a CNN interview when he was asked about the cost of living crisis.
“What do you say to those families that say, listen, we can’t afford to pay $4.85 a gallon for months, if not years?” the host asked Deese.
“This is about the future of the Liberal World Order and we have to stand firm,” Deese responded.
Countless Americans couldn’t care less about preserving the “liberal world order” in support of Ukraine, and would undoubtedly rather put America first.
Indeed, polls have shown that whenever they’re told the consequences of ‘supporting Ukraine’, appetite for American involvement plummets.
But that’s not the view of the president, who also said yesterday that Americans should suffer pain at the pump for “as long as it takes” because ‘Putin bad man’.
Meanwhile, we all want to know one thing: just what exactly is the “Liberal World Order” anyway?
I mean, it sounds horrible and downright evil, but what EXACTLY is it?
It sounds like the New World Order, and we all know what their goal is….
Who is signing up for this garbage?
MTG gets it:
And I love what this guy posted:
49) { ?>
